Over 30,000 GitLab Servers Still Unpatched Against Critical Bug

Over 30,000 GitLab Servers Still Unpatched Against Critical Bug

A critical unauthenticated, remote code execution GitLab flaw fixed on April 14, 2021, remains exploitable, with over 50% of deployments remaining unpatched.

The vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2021-22205 and has a CVSS v3 score of 10.0, allowing an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as the ‘git’ user (repository admin).

This vulnerability gives the remote attacker full access to the repository, including deleting, modifying, and stealing source code.

Also Read: What Does Resolution Of Data Really Means

Exploitation in the wild

Hackers first started exploiting internet-facing GitLab servers in June 2021 to create new users and give them admin rights.

The actors used a working exploit published on GitHub on June 4, 2021, allowing them to abuse the vulnerable ExifTool component.

The threat actors do not need to authenticate or use a CSRF token or even a valid HTTP endpoint to use the exploit.

With the exploitation continuing to this day, researchers from Rapid7 decided to look into the number of unpatched systems and determine the scope of the underlying problem.

According to a report published by Rapid7, at least 50% of the 60,000 internet-facing GitLab installations they found are not patched against the critical RCE flaw fixed six months ago.

Moreover, another 29% may or may not be vulnerable, as the analysts couldn’t extract the version string for those servers.

Also Read: Top 10 Data Protection Cases That You Must Know About

Admins need to update to one of the following versions to patch the flaw:

  • 13.10.3
  • 13.9.6
  • 13.8.8

Any versions earlier than that and down to 11.9 are vulnerable to exploitation whether you’re using GitLab Enterprise Edition (EE) or GitLab Community Edition (CE).

For more details on how to update GitLab, check out this dedicated portal.

To ensure that your GitLab instance isn’t vulnerable to exploitation, you can check its response to POST requests that attempt to exploit ExifTool’s mishandling of image files.

The patched versions still allow someone to reach out to ExifTool, but the response to the request should be rejection in the form of an HTTP 404 error.

Privacy Ninja

Recent Posts

Role of Enhanced Access Controls in Safeguarding Personal Data in Telecommunications

Role of Enhanced Access Controls in Safeguarding Personal Data in Telecommunications that every Organisation in…

2 weeks ago

Role of Effective Incident Response Procedures in Strengthening Data Security

Effective Incident Response Procedures in Strengthening Data Security that every Organisation in Singapore should know…

2 weeks ago

Strengthening Your Cyber Defenses: The Crucial Role of Regular Vulnerability Scanning

Crucial Role of Regular Vulnerability Scanning that every Organisation in Singapore should know. Strengthening Your…

2 weeks ago

Enhancing Data Security with Multi-Factor Authentication

Enhancing Data Security with Multi-Factor Authentication that every Organisation in Singapore should know. Enhancing Data…

3 weeks ago

A Strong Password Policy: Your Organization’s First Line of Defense Against Data Breaches

Strong Password Policy as a first line of defense against data breaches for Organisations in…

3 weeks ago

Enhancing Website Security: The Importance of Efficient Access Controls

Importance of Efficient Access Controls that every Organisation in Singapore should take note of. Enhancing…

4 weeks ago